EAU 76 vs REG 93 — MAR 5

EAU
76 - 93
REG
finished MAR 5
Watch on OSN
AI Recap

REG Unleashes Fourth Quarter Fury to Overcome EAU Rwanda's Early Dominance

East Africa University Rwanda Men (EAU Rwanda) controlled the first half against REG, establishing a lead in the opening quarter (20-19) and extending it significantly by halftime, outscoring REG 25-18 in the second to take a comfortable 45-37 advantage into the break. EAU Rwanda's strong start saw them hold the lead for an impressive 32:46 of the game.

The third quarter saw a more balanced affair, with both teams scoring 20 points, leaving EAU Rwanda still up by eight, 65-57, heading into the final frame. However, the fourth quarter proved to be a complete turnaround. REG ignited an offensive surge, dominating EAU Rwanda 28-19, flipping the script entirely and ultimately securing a commanding 93-76 victory. Their biggest scoring run of 8 points (57-65) was crucial in bridging the gap.

REG's superior efficiency, boasting 1.11 points per possession compared to EAU Rwanda's 0.93, eventually wore down their opponents. Despite EAU Rwanda's early control, REG's ability to generate points from turnovers (23 vs 14) and their deeper bench production (27 vs 14) were key factors in their decisive comeback.

Key Performers
22 PTS · 13 REB

Led REG with a crucial double-double, showcasing his scoring and rebounding prowess, especially vital in the comeback.

20 PTS · 5 AST · 6 STL

Provided an all-around stellar performance, combining efficient scoring with exceptional defensive disruption, highlighted by his game-high 6 steals.

Ronald Nato Kolmia East Africa University Rwanda Men
24 PTS · (6/9 3P) · 9 REB

Was the offensive engine for EAU Rwanda, pouring in a game-high 24 points, largely fueled by an impressive six three-pointers.

Niyubahwe Yamn East Africa University Rwanda Men
12 PTS · 14 REB · 3 BLK · 3 STL

Anchored EAU Rwanda's interior play with a dominant rebounding effort and significant defensive contributions in blocks and steals.

Team Comparison
EAU
  • Strong fourth-quarter performance and comeback ability
  • High points per possession (1.11)
  • Effective at converting turnovers into points (23 points from turnovers)
  • Significant bench production (27 bench points)
  • Slow start, only held the lead for 03:33 initially
  • Allowed opponent to build a substantial lead through three quarters
REG
  • Strong start, held the lead for the majority of the game (32:46)
  • Effective three-point shooting from key players (Ronald Nato Kolmia)
  • Dominant rebounding from Niyubahwe Yamn
  • Inability to close out the game in the fourth quarter
  • Lower points per possession (0.93)
  • Struggled with turnovers contributing to opponent's score (14 points from turnovers)
  • Lower bench production (14 bench points)
Stat Highlights
  • Fourth Quarter Dominance REG outscored EAU Rwanda 28-19 in the final quarter, erasing an eight-point deficit to secure the win.
  • Lead Duration Paradox EAU Rwanda held the lead for 32:46 of the game, yet ultimately lost by 17 points, showcasing REG's late-game surge.
  • Points from Turnovers REG capitalized on EAU Rwanda's errors, scoring 23 points from turnovers compared to EAU Rwanda's 14.
  • Bench Impact REG's bench provided a significant boost with 27 points, nearly double EAU Rwanda's 14 bench points.
  • Individual Rebounding Niyubahwe Yamn of EAU Rwanda led all rebounders with 14 boards, while REG's Kamndoh Betoudji Frank secured a double-double with 13 rebounds.
Game Flow

The game began with East Africa University Rwanda Men asserting control, taking a narrow 20-19 lead in Q1 and extending it to an 8-point advantage (45-37) by halftime. They maintained this lead through the third quarter, matching REG's 20 points to enter the final frame still up 65-57. The turning point arrived dramatically in the fourth quarter. REG, who had held the lead for only 03:33 earlier in the game, exploded with a 28-19 run, completely flipping the momentum. They erased the deficit, took control, and expanded their lead to their biggest of the game, 17 points, by the final buzzer, sealing a dominant comeback victory.

Leading Players

Team Comparison

EAU REG
76 PTS 93
38 REB 41
19 AST 18
10 STL 13
5 BLK 6
21 TO 17
40.6% FG% 44.2%
47.6% 3P% 37.9%
62.5% FT% 77.8%

Scoring by Quarter

19 20 18 25 20 20 19 28

Lead Progression

End of quarter
-1-8-8-17

Scoring Contribution

EAU 8 scorers
76 PTS
Ronald Nato Kolmia 24 pts 32% of team
REG 10 scorers
93 PTS
Kamndoh Betoudji Frank 22 pts 24% of team
# Player MINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVFG3PTFTOREBDREBPF+/-EFF
3 32:32 11 1 2 0 0 1 4/6 1/2 2/2 0 1 2 -12 11
5 24:56 12 3 2 1 0 1 4/10 0/1 4/5 2 1 2 -11 10
6 28:15 24 9 1 1 0 3 8/15 6/9 2/5 1 8 4 -16 22
9 21:27 3 2 4 1 0 3 1/5 1/2 0/0 0 2 3 +1 3
14 30:45 12 14 4 3 3 3 5/13 0/0 2/3 8 6 5 -7 24
0 6:39 2 0 0 0 0 2 1/3 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 -4 -2
1 21:13 5 4 4 3 0 3 2/7 1/4 0/1 0 4 1 -7 7
2 21:00 7 3 1 1 2 4 3/7 1/3 0/0 1 2 1 -11 6
8 2:08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 -8 -1
17 11:05 0 2 1 0 0 1 0/2 0/0 0/0 1 1 1 -10 0
22 DNP
24 DNP
TOTALS 200 76 38 19 10 5 21 28/69 10/21 10/16 13 25 19 80
SHOOTING 40.6% 47.6% 62.5%

REG

# Player MINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVFG3PTFTOREBDREBPF+/-EFF
4 17:59 5 5 0 2 0 0 2/4 1/2 0/0 1 4 2 +4 10
9 24:45 20 1 5 6 0 2 7/14 4/6 2/2 0 1 1 +20 23
10 36:04 22 13 3 0 1 4 9/24 1/4 3/4 7 6 2 +19 19
11 14:35 3 0 2 2 0 2 1/4 1/3 0/0 0 0 2 +2 2
55 25:00 16 7 2 0 2 2 7/10 0/0 2/4 3 4 3 +10 20
2 5:03 3 1 0 0 0 1 1/1 1/1 0/0 1 0 1 -1 3
5 21:09 12 3 4 1 0 0 3/7 1/4 5/6 0 3 1 +5 15
13 4:48 0 1 0 0 0 2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 1 3 -7 -1
14 16:07 2 2 0 2 1 1 1/3 0/2 0/0 1 1 0 +5 4
17 10:23 2 5 0 0 2 1 1/3 0/0 0/0 2 3 0 +14 6
33 24:08 8 3 2 0 0 2 2/7 2/7 2/2 0 3 1 +14 6
63 DNP
TOTALS 200 93 41 18 13 6 17 34/77 11/29 14/18 15 26 16 107
SHOOTING 44.2% 37.9% 77.8%
Stat legend
MIN Minutes played
PTS Points scored
REB Total rebounds
AST Assists
STL Steals
BLK Blocks
TOV Turnovers
FG Field goals (made/attempted)
3PT 3-pointers (made/attempted)
FT Free throws (made/attempted)
OREB Offensive rebounds
DREB Defensive rebounds
PF Personal fouls
+/- Plus/minus — points scored vs allowed while the player was on the court
EFF Efficiency rating (NBA formula: PTS + REB + AST + STL + BLK − missed FG − missed FT − TO)
Row markers
S Starter
C Captain
DNP Did not play