PAT 84 vs GEN 42 — MAR 19

PAT
84 - 42
GEN
finished MAR 19
Watch on OSN
AI Recap

Patriots Demolish Inspired Generation in Comprehensive 42-Point Rout

The Patriots delivered a basketball masterclass, obliterating Inspired Generation 84-42 in a one-sided affair that saw them lead from start to finish. The home team established their dominance early, taking a 16-11 lead in the first quarter, fueled by efficient scoring and stifling defense, and never looked back.

The second quarter saw the Patriots truly break away, outscoring Inspired Generation 25-10 to build a commanding 41-21 halftime advantage. Their relentless attack continued into the third, extending the lead with a 17-13 quarter, and then exploded in the final frame, pouring in 26 points to Inspired Generation's 8, culminating in a colossal 42-point victory. The Patriots controlled the game for 39:17, never relinquishing their lead, and showcased a devastating 14-point scoring run to close out the game.

Patriots' offensive prowess was evident in their 48 points in the paint and 30 fast break points, coupled with 25 points generated from Inspired Generation's turnovers. Their bench also contributed significantly with 24 points, highlighting the team's depth. Inspired Generation, in contrast, struggled immensely, managing a mere 0.52 points per possession compared to Patriots' efficient 1.03, and failed to register a single moment with the lead.

Key Performers
20 PTS · 7/10 FG · 4/6 3P · 7 REB · 2 STL · 2 BLK

Hodal was an offensive spark, leading all scorers with highly efficient shooting, including four crucial three-pointers, and contributing significantly on defense.

17 PTS · 8/18 FG · 9 REB · 3 AST · 2 STL

Kwzera stuffed the stat sheet, providing consistent scoring and dominating the boards for the Patriots.

16 PTS · 6/12 FG · 5 REB · 3 BLK · 2 STL

Darion was a force on both ends, scoring efficiently and anchoring the Patriots' defense with a game-high three blocks.

Kubanatubane Philippe Inspired Generation
14 PTS · 5/17 FG · 2/10 3P · 6 REB

Philippe was the lone bright spot for Inspired Generation, attempting to carry the scoring load despite facing tough defensive pressure.

Mbuandjo Jean Paul Inspired Generation
8 PTS · 10 REB

Mbuandjo battled hard on the glass, leading his team in rebounding with a double-digit effort.

Team Comparison
PAT
  • Dominant scoring (84 points)
  • Exceptional efficiency (1.03 points per possession)
  • Strong interior play (48 points in the paint)
  • Devastating fast break (30 points)
  • Excellent bench production (24 points)
  • Effective at forcing and capitalizing on turnovers (25 points from turnovers)
  • Strong defense (39:17 time with lead, 42-point biggest lead)
  • Some individual 3-point shooting struggles (e.g., Kwzera 1/8 from deep)
GEN
  • Strong rebounding from Mbuandjo Jean Paul (10 rebounds) and Asiribo Samuel (11 rebounds)
  • Anemic scoring (42 points)
  • Poor shooting efficiency (0.52 points per possession, Lambe-Embolajoseph 1/15 FG)
  • High turnovers (Patriots scored 25 points from turnovers)
  • Lack of fast break opportunities (7 points)
  • Minimal bench contribution (6 points)
  • Inability to hold or gain a lead (00:00 time with lead)
Stat Highlights
  • Biggest Lead Patriots held a staggering 42-point lead (84-42) in the game.
  • Points in the Paint Patriots dominated inside with 48 points in the paint, compared to Inspired Generation's 24.
  • Fast Break Points Patriots capitalized on transitions with 30 fast break points, dwarfing Inspired Generation's 7.
  • Points from Turnovers Patriots scored 25 points off Inspired Generation's miscues, while only giving up 11.
  • Bench Production Patriots' reserves outscored Inspired Generation's bench 24-6.
  • Lead Control Patriots led for 39:17, never trailing at any point in the game.
Game Flow

The Patriots seized control from the opening tip and never looked back. They quickly established a lead in Q1 (16-11) and steadily extended it through Q2 (25-10 run) and Q3 (17-13 run). Inspired Generation never held the lead, with the Patriots maintaining possession of the lead for the entire 39:17 of the game. The turning point was arguably the Patriots' dominant second quarter, which set the tone for the rest of the game, culminating in a 14-point scoring run in the fourth quarter to achieve their biggest lead of 42 points.

Team Comparison

PAT GEN
84 PTS 42
51 REB 32
17 AST 6
13 STL 7
8 BLK 4
15 TO 18
43.0% FG% 25.7%
18.8% 3P% 10.5%
55.6% FT% 40.0%

Scoring by Quarter

16 11 25 10 17 13 26 8

Lead Progression

End of quarter
+5+20+24+42

Scoring Contribution

PAT 10 scorers
84 PTS
Irakoze Herve Hodal 20 pts 24% of team
GEN 7 scorers
42 PTS
Kubanatubane Philippe 14 pts 33% of team
# Player MINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVFG3PTFTOREBDREBPF+/-EFF
2 12:40 7 3 5 1 0 3 3/5 1/2 0/0 1 2 0 +16 11
10 11:00 0 5 0 1 0 0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0 5 0 +15 5
11 16:37 16 5 1 2 3 0 6/12 0/4 4/6 2 3 0 +32 19
13 30:47 17 9 3 2 0 2 8/18 1/8 0/0 5 4 1 +40 19
34 23:40 20 7 0 2 2 3 7/10 4/6 2/4 3 4 0 +32 23
0 17:06 6 7 2 1 0 0 3/7 0/4 0/0 1 6 3 +23 12
7 19:22 5 3 0 0 0 1 2/6 0/2 1/3 1 2 3 +17 1
14 14:46 0 1 2 0 1 2 0/4 0/3 0/0 1 0 0 +15 -2
23 12:26 1 4 1 3 0 3 0/4 0/1 1/2 2 2 1 +8 1
24 18:45 9 3 2 1 0 0 4/6 0/2 1/1 1 2 2 +6 13
32 6:52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0/2 0/0 1/2 0 0 1 +3 -2
55 15:59 2 4 1 0 2 1 1/4 0/0 0/0 1 3 0 +3 5
TOTALS 200 84 51 17 13 8 15 34/79 6/32 10/18 18 33 11 105
SHOOTING 43.0% 18.8% 55.6%
# Player MINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVFG3PTFTOREBDREBPF+/-EFF
4 36:33 4 0 2 2 0 6 1/15 0/6 2/4 0 0 3 -39 -14
9 37:12 14 6 1 0 0 3 5/17 2/10 2/2 1 5 0 -32 6
11 19:48 6 3 0 1 1 1 3/7 0/0 0/0 2 1 4 -14 6
13 27:43 8 10 2 1 0 0 4/17 0/3 0/2 0 10 2 -29 6
15 36:58 4 11 0 1 2 2 2/6 0/0 0/0 2 9 3 -39 12
5 16:32 4 1 0 0 0 3 2/3 0/0 0/0 1 0 2 -22 1
6 14:18 2 1 0 1 0 0 1/4 0/0 0/2 1 0 0 -8 -1
7 4:21 0 0 0 0 1 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 -8 1
8 6:35 0 0 1 1 0 3 0/1 0/0 0/0 0 0 1 -19 -2
10 DNP
14 DNP
TOTALS 200 42 32 6 7 4 18 18/70 2/19 4/10 7 25 15 15
SHOOTING 25.7% 10.5% 40.0%
Stat legend
MIN Minutes played
PTS Points scored
REB Total rebounds
AST Assists
STL Steals
BLK Blocks
TOV Turnovers
FG Field goals (made/attempted)
3PT 3-pointers (made/attempted)
FT Free throws (made/attempted)
OREB Offensive rebounds
DREB Defensive rebounds
PF Personal fouls
+/- Plus/minus — points scored vs allowed while the player was on the court
EFF Efficiency rating (NBA formula: PTS + REB + AST + STL + BLK − missed FG − missed FT − TO)
Row markers
S Starter
C Captain
DNP Did not play